Appeal@BeckVsDOE.wellrock.net
Under
construction: Last Updated 20031217
Beck
vs DOE: Application of
Plaintiffs-Appellants to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for
direct appellate review
Table
of Contents:
- Beck
vs DOE: Application of Plaintiffs-Appellants to the Massachusetts
Supreme Judicial Court for direct appellate review
- (12/17/03) Application of
Plaintiffs-Appellants to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for
direct appellate review (pdf)
- (12/15/03) NOTICE OF ENTRY OF
APPLICATION FOR DIRECT APPELLATE REVIEW (pdf)
- (12/16/03) OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS’
REQUEST FOR DIRECT APPELLATE REVIEW OF SOUTH SHORE CHARTER SCHOOL,
TIMOTHY ANDERSON, AND GREGORY L. THORNTON Filed by Mark W. Batten
on December 16, 2003 (pdf)
- (12/15/03) NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY,
Batten Opposition (pdf)
1. Per Massachusetts Rule of Appellate Procedure 11,
David L. Higgs and Rodney W. Young, plaintiffs-appellants in the above
named action, respectfully apply to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial
Court for direct appellate review of the dismissal by Plymouth Superior
Court of their defamation suit.
2. Beck et al.
vs. DOE et al. is on appeal from a decision and order of summary
judgment signed on February 25, 2002 by Plymouth Superior Court Justice
Richard J. Chin, dismissing all charges against the eight defendants.....
3. The
plaintiffs’ appeal focuses upon the following issues:
a. The Court’s falsification of the record in Beck v. DOE in thirteen
instances, defeating plaintiffs’ arguments of malicious defamation and
rationalizing its decision and order of summary judgment on behalf of
the defendants. Three of the fabrications alleged are presented
in this application:
(1) In
its decision the Court
deliberately misquotes an official report of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, to justify the Court’s opinion that certain
statements of the defendants, alleged slanderous in the Complaint, were
made without malice, and therefore had not legally defamed “... the
plaintiffs [judged] to be public figures for the purpose of this
defamation action.” [p. 35]
(2) Similarlythe Court
falsifies an internal report prepared by trustees of the Defendant South
Shore Charter School, to justify the Court’s opinion that certain
written statements of a defendant, alleged libelous in the Complaint,
were made without malice, and therefore had not legally defamed “... the
plaintiffs [as] public figures ....” [Continue]
(pdf)
"INTRODUCTION
Appellees South Shore Charter School, Timothy Anderson, and Gregory L.
Thornton ("SSCS Appellees”) respectfully request that
appellants'petition for direct appellate review be denied. The pro- se
appellants identify no questions of first impression, novel questions of
law, nor any matters of substantial public interest in this simple
defamation case that merit direct appellate review. [continue pdf]
A majority of the
reference documents in "An Appeal Held Hostage" are Protable
Document Format (PDF) files. If you don't have a PDF reader
installed and integrated with you web browser, then you can get the
Abode Reader (free: for viewing and printing PDF files) directly
from the Acrobat web site [http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html].
The Beck vs. DOE web site contains
over 250 Megs of HTML files and PDF reference documents. The
Plaintiffs in Beck vs. DOE can supply a copy of the Beck vs. DOE web
site on a CD for off line viewing. Please e-mail Appeal@BeckVsDOE.wellrock.net to request a copy of the Beck vs. DOE web
site.
For additional information about the Beck vs DOE law suit,
please e-mail Appeal.BeckVsDOE@wellrock.net
WebMaster@wellrock.net